Pinkie7
03-14 06:42 PM
I have I129 document (Petition for Nonimmigrant worker) which was valid from 10/01/07 to 09/24/2010. However i never used it. As My husband is working in US on H1b visa, i am now looking for job in US. Can you please let me know if this I129 can be used or not. I would highly appreciate early response.
Thanks
Thanks
wallpaper Kelly Rowland NEW HAIR amp; NEW
myimmiv
06-08 03:51 PM
Thanks Elaine for your reply. Yes you are right, it is a substituted labor, but I have raised the concern because my PD is May 2005 which is after PERM came in effect. Hence how did the lawyer use the old (pre PERM) EAT 750B for this labor ?
waitforgc1
06-05 04:40 PM
Thanks!!! For providing this information.
2011 Tag Archives: kelly rowland
REEF�
06-18 11:31 AM
If i look at those will i get shot 9 times?? :P
Good work (even if i'm not a fan......)What a corny joke :lol:
Nice work amit, man is that guy fugly or what
Good work (even if i'm not a fan......)What a corny joke :lol:
Nice work amit, man is that guy fugly or what
more...
n2b
07-24 11:06 AM
Hello Friends,
I am working for a Company A and I have a Labor and I 140 approved for OCT 2005 EB2 through the same company.
I filed my I 485 on July 2nd. Now I have a very good offer from Company B. I have following questions and I seek your help -
1) Can I retain my PD?
2) If yes, what are the requirements and what is the process to retain the old PD?
3) Does the Company B have to file I 140 again?
4) What if Company A pulls back their I 140? Can they?
5) What are the risks?
6) Has anyone done this and had a success?
Friends, all your help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
I am working for a Company A and I have a Labor and I 140 approved for OCT 2005 EB2 through the same company.
I filed my I 485 on July 2nd. Now I have a very good offer from Company B. I have following questions and I seek your help -
1) Can I retain my PD?
2) If yes, what are the requirements and what is the process to retain the old PD?
3) Does the Company B have to file I 140 again?
4) What if Company A pulls back their I 140? Can they?
5) What are the risks?
6) Has anyone done this and had a success?
Friends, all your help is appreciated.
Thank you in advance.
yabadaba
11-14 05:01 AM
Guys
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
they are having an oversight hearing on a program that places cold war veterans in energy occupations and they were subject to illness. remember "Claims" in Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.
Please dont get confused so easily. They have more important matters than a few thousand skilled immigrants
Please chk this URL its about lame duck session . I know its dated Nov 9th but still.
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/B?r109:@FIELD(FLD003+d)+@FIELD(DDATE+20061109)
it says this.
November 15 and 16, Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims, oversight hearings entitled ``The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act: Are We Fulfilling the Promise We Made to Cold War Veterans When We Created the Program?'' (Parts IV and V), 2 p.m., on November 15 and 10 a.m., on November 16, 2141 Rayburn.
I m confused with above details.
Aj
they are having an oversight hearing on a program that places cold war veterans in energy occupations and they were subject to illness. remember "Claims" in Subcommittee on Immigration, Border Security, and Claims.
Please dont get confused so easily. They have more important matters than a few thousand skilled immigrants
more...
uvs
09-24 12:24 PM
thanks!
2010 kelly rowland hair color.
MetteBB
05-10 01:45 PM
2nd stamp
more...
himu73
07-03 10:34 AM
If for a moment we say USCIS has really increased the processing rate and more people are getting green cards which we see is the case. It may signal that on Oct 1st,2007 dates will move ahead of what was the scenario in May visa bulletin.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
If we forget the mistake they did in July bulletin and see the brighter side that they process faster, we should hold back our applications now and wait for the scenario on Oct 1st 2007, which would be hopefully a give a good realistic forward movement in dates. Since receipt date is important we should not get emotional and send in the application. This is just a thought.
Making Current in July was anyway like a lottery which denied all calculations based on pending cases.Before getting into law suits and protests which are also needed we have to take stock of all the implications and whether we really can provide 100% to these efforts.
From the posts coming since yesterday, most of the members are agitated and it seems we fail to realize that this event itself was a miscalculation and all of us were trying to get benefit of it considering the long waits we have endured for just getting a chance to file AOS.
We also knew that even if the applications are accepted there was no way we can get our green cards for a long time. AC21 and EAD for spouse was the main aim of many applicants.
This is really a sad story of people who have sacrificed career prospects, faced family separation, made important decisions like marraige.
Hope this post makes sense and we take a step back and reconsider our actions. This is not out of fear but past experience of lawsuits explained in other posts.
hair Kelly Rowland ditched the long
alterego
08-15 11:47 PM
I found this interesting. Salaries for managers are becoming quite competitive in India apparently.
Given that certain areas are especially hot in India compared to the rest of the economy and that gives you a relatively strong position and quality of life. It seems the gap between US and India is closing for people in certain fields faster than it is closing for the average joe.........for whom it will take generations at best. Perhaps we need to see that perspective.
http://in.biz.yahoo.com/060815/203/66p63.html
Given that certain areas are especially hot in India compared to the rest of the economy and that gives you a relatively strong position and quality of life. It seems the gap between US and India is closing for people in certain fields faster than it is closing for the average joe.........for whom it will take generations at best. Perhaps we need to see that perspective.
http://in.biz.yahoo.com/060815/203/66p63.html
more...
Alcanor
June 26th, 2004, 02:42 AM
Hi, I'm a 17 years old boy from Spain. I'm new in this forum and I think that a photo would be the better way for begin here.
I hope that you like it. It was taken in the Beach of "Salinas" with a Kodak DX4530.
All your comments and suggestions about the photo are welcome :D
PS: Sorry for my bad english.
I hope that you like it. It was taken in the Beach of "Salinas" with a Kodak DX4530.
All your comments and suggestions about the photo are welcome :D
PS: Sorry for my bad english.
hot Photoshoot| Kelly Rowland
chanduv23
04-02 04:11 PM
Actually stay outside the country does not constitute towards bench time. So if you are outside country - you are not in bench. One American Consulting company I used to work for way back in 2001 - used to move benched candidates to Canada (if they need to be benched for long time) and then bring them back when they get a project.
Please remember that you may be asked to prove you have a project at POE so when you come back have copies of contract to prove it.
Please verify with an Attorney on my statement above.
Please remember that you may be asked to prove you have a project at POE so when you come back have copies of contract to prove it.
Please verify with an Attorney on my statement above.
more...
house Kelly Rowland made the
n2b
07-24 11:26 AM
Can you please point me to the thread? Thank you.
tattoo Mbali na muziki Kelly pia ni
zoooom
10-29 05:54 PM
Hi ,
One of my friends applied for his GC thru a consulting company which he does not work for...He used to work for the company but left that company before he decided to file with them...Since he has good relations with the company, they decided to file for him.
The company recently filed his I140 but they got a RFE on I140. INS wants to know why does the company want to hire him and why he left the company in the first place..does anyone in the forum has a similar experience to share...The RFE is actually for the conmpany but the owner wants my friend to write a letter and mail it to the lawyer. Any help is appreciated.
One of my friends applied for his GC thru a consulting company which he does not work for...He used to work for the company but left that company before he decided to file with them...Since he has good relations with the company, they decided to file for him.
The company recently filed his I140 but they got a RFE on I140. INS wants to know why does the company want to hire him and why he left the company in the first place..does anyone in the forum has a similar experience to share...The RFE is actually for the conmpany but the owner wants my friend to write a letter and mail it to the lawyer. Any help is appreciated.
more...
pictures kelly rowland hair
anilsal
12-15 09:10 PM
Is it worthwhile to ask these Indian philantropists with enough dough to fund efforts like IV? Or are they going to give a blind eye?
dresses KELLY ROWLAND TAKES SOME GLAM
tampacoolie
07-06 09:45 PM
Why not microsoft? The rest of high tech industry will not survive if they can't move their 60% of operations outside of USA. Bone headed congress will continue to come up with legislation that encourage illegal immigration and discourage legal immigration. Sounds like 19th century for UK, 20th century for USA and 21st century for China and India. Dollar declines and what is the use of GC? I am thinking of going back where the growth is.
more...
makeup Kelly Rowlands short hair!
ak_2006
05-11 03:13 PM
Where is the bulletin. :rolleyes:
As we know, it will be out before 15th...so, we can expect by 13th or 16th in worest case :). I knew...that you have better understanding than me.
As we know, it will be out before 15th...so, we can expect by 13th or 16th in worest case :). I knew...that you have better understanding than me.
girlfriend Kelly#39;s Understated and
keshu_m
10-21 08:39 AM
My company applied for my L1B petition in 2007 which was approved and I got an L1 visa in Mar 2007 which was valid until Aug 2009. However I traveled to the U.S only in December 2008. Since my L1 visa was expiring by Aug I applied for a L1 extension in May 2009. This was rejected in August due to some confusion with the I-94. So I had to travel back to India in Aug 2009.
I then applied for a fresh L1 visa based on my company's L1 Blanket petition. I got this new L1 visa in Sep 2009 and returned back to the U.S. This new visa is valid until Sep 2011.
My question is can I apply for another L1 extension?
Will my visa duration or stay duration be considered when applying for another extension?
I have stayed in the U.S on L1 status only from Dec 2008 - Am I not allowed 5 years?
Also I am not sure whether I have exhausted my quota of extensions. Will my case be considered as 2.5 years the first time and 2 years extension the second time?
Or will the Blanket visa be considered a fresh start allowing me another extension?
Also what will happen if I transfer to H1 at this point of time ... will my L1 stay duration or my L1 visa duration be considered when deciding the H1 visa validity?
Please help with some answers...
I then applied for a fresh L1 visa based on my company's L1 Blanket petition. I got this new L1 visa in Sep 2009 and returned back to the U.S. This new visa is valid until Sep 2011.
My question is can I apply for another L1 extension?
Will my visa duration or stay duration be considered when applying for another extension?
I have stayed in the U.S on L1 status only from Dec 2008 - Am I not allowed 5 years?
Also I am not sure whether I have exhausted my quota of extensions. Will my case be considered as 2.5 years the first time and 2 years extension the second time?
Or will the Blanket visa be considered a fresh start allowing me another extension?
Also what will happen if I transfer to H1 at this point of time ... will my L1 stay duration or my L1 visa duration be considered when deciding the H1 visa validity?
Please help with some answers...
hairstyles kelly rowland hair 2011.
bkarnik
03-08 02:13 PM
This is my opinion only (not IV's).
My feeling is that the Iraq Accountability Act and other similar bills that will be flooding the Congress with the Democrats in majority should have a minimal impact if any on the CIR. First, the CIR whenever it is introduced will be referred to the Judiciary committees of the Senate and House for markup. After the Judiciary committee is done, then the modified version will come before the entire Senate and House for additional discussion, debate, amendments, etc. before going to a vote. Assuming the bills are passed by the Senate and House, they will have a conference to sort out the differences in the House and Senate bills and then this final version of the bill will be placed before the House and Senate for a final vote. Once, this vote takes place and the bill is passed, then it goes to the President for signature.
In a nutshell, the CIR will alongwith other bills be processed in a parallel manner. A lot is in the hands of the Senate Majority Leader (sen. Reid) and House Speaker (Rep. Pelosi) in when and how long they want to schedule a debate on any bill that has passed through committee and is ready for floor action.
My feeling is that the Iraq Accountability Act and other similar bills that will be flooding the Congress with the Democrats in majority should have a minimal impact if any on the CIR. First, the CIR whenever it is introduced will be referred to the Judiciary committees of the Senate and House for markup. After the Judiciary committee is done, then the modified version will come before the entire Senate and House for additional discussion, debate, amendments, etc. before going to a vote. Assuming the bills are passed by the Senate and House, they will have a conference to sort out the differences in the House and Senate bills and then this final version of the bill will be placed before the House and Senate for a final vote. Once, this vote takes place and the bill is passed, then it goes to the President for signature.
In a nutshell, the CIR will alongwith other bills be processed in a parallel manner. A lot is in the hands of the Senate Majority Leader (sen. Reid) and House Speaker (Rep. Pelosi) in when and how long they want to schedule a debate on any bill that has passed through committee and is ready for floor action.
shahpeerally
12-04 09:17 PM
Re: #1
Good question.
The rule is misleading and your confusion is understandable. Do not file in the CSC, it will likely be rejected, or if you're lucky, they might overlook it or transfer the case to VSC.
The filing location will be the VSC because that's your worksite. The rule requiring you to file in CSC has to do with the "H-1b employer" itself being cap exempt (ie. institutions of higher education and certain non-profit organizations). Your H-1b employer is a for-profit company, I assume, so they are not exempt from the cap.
Re: #2
Section 2.2 should be "e" if you're porting to a new employer, if it's a pure extension with the same employer, pick "b."
Section 2.5 should be "c."
Good question.
The rule is misleading and your confusion is understandable. Do not file in the CSC, it will likely be rejected, or if you're lucky, they might overlook it or transfer the case to VSC.
The filing location will be the VSC because that's your worksite. The rule requiring you to file in CSC has to do with the "H-1b employer" itself being cap exempt (ie. institutions of higher education and certain non-profit organizations). Your H-1b employer is a for-profit company, I assume, so they are not exempt from the cap.
Re: #2
Section 2.2 should be "e" if you're porting to a new employer, if it's a pure extension with the same employer, pick "b."
Section 2.5 should be "c."
nonimmi
07-20 12:53 PM
Rule 1: Life is not fair -- get used to it!
- From Bill Gates' 11 Rules of Life
- From Bill Gates' 11 Rules of Life
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario